Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Baker v. State

Baker v. State

852 So. 2d 311, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11044, 2003 WL 21697012
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 796 So. 2d 589 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2003·No. No. 3D03-1282·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Clarence Baker appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. We have taken judicial notice of this court’s file Baker v. State, 741 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The claims in the present case are substantially identical to those rejected in the earlier appeal. Further, review of the transcript of the sentencing hearing reveals that the defendant admitted the existence of the convictions necessary to qualify him as a habitual offender, the trial court’s oral pronouncement adequately adjudicates him a habitual offender, and the sentence imposed is the sentence announced by the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 852 So. 2d 311, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11044, 2003 WL 21697012 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

852 So. 2d 311 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.