Baker v. State

787 So. 2d 41, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1860, 2001 WL 166488
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3530·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Glenn Baker appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Baker alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate a voluntary intoxication defense on Baker’s behalf. The trial court erroneously denied the claim as facially insufficient. The trial court is directed to reconsider the claim in light of Stanley v. State, 703 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). The order of the trial court is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 787 So. 2d 41, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1860, 2001 WL 166488 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 41 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
92 So. 3d 1218 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)