Baker v. State
659 So. 2d 713, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9144, 1995 WL 509297
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 1995·No. No. 94-1643·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s conviction but reverse for resentencing and direct that Appellant be permitted to elect to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines effective 1983. See State v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987); Anderson v. State, 550 So.2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
We note that Appellant was convicted under section 782.04(2), Florida Statutes, and not under section 775.082(3)(a), Florida Statutes, and therefore is not excepted from section 921.001, Florida Statutes. See Dunn v. State, 522 So.2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. State, 659 So. 2d 713, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9144, 1995 WL 509297 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
659 So. 2d 713 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowder v. State
735 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Weinstock v. Groth
659 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)