Baker v. State

622 So. 2d 193, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8497, 1993 WL 310731
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 619 So. 2d 411
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 1993·No. No. 92-2082·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of conviction and sentence for violating a domestic violence injunction. At a hearing, the trial court pronounced appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt. However, the final judgment does not contain a recital of the facts constituting the contempt, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(a)(6), nor were sufficient oral findings made at the hearing to satisfy the rule. Gidden v. State, 613 So.2d 457 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for entry of a corrected judgment and sentence.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 622 So. 2d 193, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8497, 1993 WL 310731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 193 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gidden v. State
613 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)