Baker v. State

501 So. 2d 17, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 121, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10983
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 852
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 1986·No. Nos. 85-1592, 85-1593 and 85-1723·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal from their convictions and sentences for the unlicensed practice of medicine.1 After careful review of the record, we find no merit in appellants’ contentions, except as noted below.

The jury returned guilty verdicts against Tracy Baker on a total of twenty counts2 and found him not guilty of Count XXXVI. However, the trial court erroneously convicted and sentenced him on Count XXXVI. We therefore quash the conviction and sentence as to this count. In all other respects the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

[18]*18AFFIRMED IN PART, QUASHED IN PART.

DAUKSCH, COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 501 So. 2d 17, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 121, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

501 So. 2d 17 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.