Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Baker v. State

Baker v. State

448 So. 2d 36
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1984·No. AV-455·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

448 So.2d 36 (1984)

James R. BAKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. AV-455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 1984.

Appellant pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and T. Edward Austin, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court's order of 19 October 1983, denying appellant's Rule 3.850 motion dated 27 July 1983, is affirmed. The Rule 3.850 motion is not in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Rule in that it is not under oath and fails to contain the information required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of the Rule. See Catlett v. State, 367 So.2d 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and WENTWORTH, JJ., and McCORD (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 448 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

448 So. 2d 36 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. State
555 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cherry v. State
526 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Rowe v. State
474 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
McWilliams v. State
469 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)