Baker v. Southern Railway Co.

390 S.E.2d 576, 260 Ga. 115, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 157
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 20, 1990
DocketS89G0462
StatusPublished
Cited by50 cases

This text of 390 S.E.2d 576 (Baker v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Southern Railway Co., 390 S.E.2d 576, 260 Ga. 115, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 157 (Ga. 1990).

Opinions

Clarke, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether the trial' court was authorized to dismiss the appeal under OCGA § 5-6-48 (c) because of failure to timely file a transcript. OCGA § 5-6-42 provides that a transcript must be filed within 30 days after the filing of the notice of appeal unless the time is extended as provided by OCGA § 5-6-39. OCGA § 5-6-48 provides that the trial court may, after notice and hearing, order an appeal dismissed for a party’s failure to timely file a transcript if the delay was 1) unreasonable, 2) inexcusable, and 3) caused by such party.

On December 15, 1987, Baker filed a notice of appeal from the order of the trial court granting a directed verdict for Southern Railway Company. Baker paid for the preparation of a transcript. Approximately one week before expiration of the statutory period provided by OCGA § 5-6-42 for filing the transcript, his attorney’s secretary contacted the court reporter. The reporter said that the transcript would be completed within two or three days. Baker did not seek an extension. The court reporter did not timely complete the transcript due to health problems in her family. The transcript was finally filed 34 days late.

The trial court dismissed the appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-48 [116]*116(c), finding that the delay in the filing of the transcript was unreasonable and was inexcusable because Baker failed to request an extension of time within which to file the transcript. The Court of Appeals, relying primarily upon Glen Restaurants v. Building 5 Assoc., 189 Ga. App. 327 (375 SE2d 492) (1988), and Hatfield v. Great American Management &c., Inc., 190 Ga. App. 534 (379 SE2d 544) (1989), held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appeal and affirmed. Baker v. Southern R. Co., 192 Ga. App. 444 (385 SE2d 125) (1989).

In Wagner v. Howell, 257 Ga. 801 (363 SE2d 759) (1988), we discussed the fact that OCGA § 5-6-48 (c) sets forth three criteria for dismissal of an appeal for failure to timely file a transcript: 1) unreasonable delay which was 2) unexcusable and 3) “caused by such party.” We also discussed language in OCGA § 5-6-48 (f) which indicates that the failure of a court reporter to file the transcript will not constitute cause for dismissal “unless it affirmatively appears from the record that the failure was caused by the appellant.” In Wagner the court reporter filed the transcript six days late. We found that under the facts of the case this did not amount to an unreasonable delay and that it did not affirmatively appear from the record that this delay was caused by the appellant. Therefore, the trial court erred in dismissing the appeal. Restating the rule in Wagner, we reiterate our holding that the trial court has discretion to dismiss an appeal for failure to timely file a transcript only if 1) the delay in filing was unreasonable; 2) the failure to timely file was inexcusable in that it was caused by some act of the party responsible for filing the transcript. Any cases in conflict with this rule are hereby overruled.

In the present case the trial court predicated its conclusion of the delay being unreasonable and inexcusable upon the failure of Baker to seek an extension. The trial court did not make a specific finding that the failure to file was caused by Baker. The failure to apply for an extension does not automatically convert the delay into one which fits all of the conditions necessary to vest the trial court with the discretion to dismiss the appeal. The court must find all these conditions before an exercise of discretion is authorized. We remand this case for further action by the trial court in accordance with this opinion.

Case remanded with direction.

Clarke, C. J., Bell, Hunt, JJ., and Judge Robert J. Castellani concur; Smith, P. J., Weltner and Fletcher, JJ., concur specially; Benham, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell Carbonara v. Fortress Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021
Chanda M. Gordon v. Tracy E. Dennis
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018
Gordon v. Dennis
817 S.E.2d 561 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018)
CALLAWAY Et Al. v. GARNER Et Al.
796 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2017)
Jefferson Lakeside L. P. v. Allan Ali Allan
775 S.E.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Crandall Postell v. Alfa Insurance Corporation
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
Postell v. Alfa Insurance
757 S.E.2d 661 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Pistacchio v. Frasso
711 S.E.2d 98 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Pioneer Security & Investigations, Inc. v. Hyatt Corp.
671 S.E.2d 266 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Roy v. Shetty
616 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Hadavi v. Palmer
580 S.E.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
McCorvey Development, Inc. v. D. G. Jenkins Development Corp.
581 S.E.2d 308 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Watson v. State
572 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Crown Diamond Co. v. N. Y. Diamond Corp.
530 S.E.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Bass v. Mercer
524 S.E.2d 260 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Burns v. Howard
520 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
In the Interest of D. M. C.
501 S.E.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Central of Georgia Railroad v. DEC Associates, Inc.
501 S.E.2d 6 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 S.E.2d 576, 260 Ga. 115, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-southern-railway-co-ga-1990.