Baker v. Moore
3 N.J.L. 962
Opinion
certiorari was returnable in September Term, 1811, and is now before the court for consideration, without reasons assigned for reversal. This would be sufficient ground to dismiss [*] the certiorari; but as the parties have thought proper to hand it up for consideration in this State, and as upon inspecting the record, I can see no irregularity, I [700] think the judgment ought to be affirmed.
Of the same opinion.
Inclined to give time to file errors.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited in Holmes v. Williams, 2 Penn. 962.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Moore, 3 N.J.L. 962 (N.J. 1812).
3 N.J.L. 962 (Baker v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.