Baker v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Baker v. Moore

3 N.J.L. 961

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1812·Published

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— This certiorari was returnable in September term, 1811, and is now before the Court for consideration, without reasons assigned for reversal. This would bo sufficient ground to dismiss [*] the certiorari; hut as the parties have thought proper to hand it up for consideration in this state, and as upon inspecting the record, I [700]*700can see no irregularity, I think the judgment ought to be affirmed.

Rosseii, J. — -Of the same opinion. Pennington, J, — Inclined to give time to file errors.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— This certiorari was returnable in September term, 1811, and is now before the Court for consideration, without reasons assigned for reversal. This would bo sufficient ground to dismiss [*] the certiorari; hut as the parties have thought proper to hand it up for consideration in this state, and as upon inspecting the record, I [700]*700can see no irregularity, I think the judgment ought to be affirmed.

Rosseii, J. — -Of the same opinion. Pennington, J, — Inclined to give time to file errors.

Judgment affirmed.

Baker v. Moore, 3 N.J.L. 961 (N.J. 1812).

Pincite

3 N.J.L. 961 (Baker v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.