Baker v. Johnson

60 F. App'x 463
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2003·No. No. 03-6123·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bernard M. Baker, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge construing Baker’s petition as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying relief. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baker has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039-40, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Johnson, 60 F. App'x 463 (4th Cir. 2003).

60 F. App'x 463 (Baker v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)