Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2003·No. 03-1147·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1147

TERRI BAKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREYHOUND BUS LINE; RAY ROBINSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-3239-JFM)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terri Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Karla Grossenbacher, Emily R. Friedman, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Terri Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her

suit alleging discrimination based on race and disability. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v.

Greyhound Bus Line, No. CA-02-3239-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 14, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line, (4th Cir. 2003).

Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line (Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.