Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line

63 F. App'x 164
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2003·No. No. 03-1147·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Terri Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her suit alleging discrimination based on race and disability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line, 240 F.Supp.2d 454 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line, 63 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 164 (Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line
240 F. Supp. 2d 454 (D. Maryland, 2003)