Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 2003
Docket03-1147
StatusUnpublished

This text of Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line (Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1147

TERRI BAKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREYHOUND BUS LINE; RAY ROBINSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-3239-JFM)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terri Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Karla Grossenbacher, Emily R. Friedman, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Terri Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her

suit alleging discrimination based on race and disability. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v.

Greyhound Bus Line, No. CA-02-3239-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 14, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-greyhound-bus-line-ca4-2003.