Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line
This text of Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line (Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1147
TERRI BAKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREYHOUND BUS LINE; RAY ROBINSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-3239-JFM)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terri Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Karla Grossenbacher, Emily R. Friedman, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Terri Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her
suit alleging discrimination based on race and disability. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v.
Greyhound Bus Line, No. CA-02-3239-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 14, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-greyhound-bus-line-ca4-2003.