Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe

130 So. 278, 102 Fla. 621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 Fla. 622
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 16, 1930·Published

Opinions

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *Page 622 decrees of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

TERRELL, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, STRUM AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

ELLIS AND BUFORD, J.J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe, 130 So. 278, 102 Fla. 621 (Fla. 1930).

130 So. 278 (Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.