Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Florida

Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe

130 So. 278, 102 Fla. 620

DecidedOctober 16, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 278 (Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe, 130 So. 278, 102 Fla. 620 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause 'having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefor considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Terrell, C.J., and Whitfield, Strum and Brown, J.J., concur. Ellis and Buford, J.J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause 'having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefor considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Terrell, C.J., and Whitfield, Strum and Brown, J.J., concur. Ellis and Buford, J.J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 So. 278, 102 Fla. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-et-ux-v-rowe-fla-1930.