Baird v. Schuylkill River East Side R. R.

25 A. 833, 154 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 914

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error here alleges that the learned court below erred in affirming the defendant’s fifteenth point. A careful consideration of the able argument of the learned counsel for the appellant fails to convince us that the learned judge below committed any substantial error. His charge was a clear and accurate presentation of the case, and taking the answer to the point in connection therewith, we are unable to see how the jury could have been misled. A discussion of the case is unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.