Baird v. Schuylkill River East Side R. R.
This text of 25 A. 833 (Baird v. Schuylkill River East Side R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The single assignment of error here alleges that the learned court below erred in affirming the defendant’s fifteenth point. [463]*463A careful consideration of the able argument of the learned counsel for the appellant fails to convince us that the learned judge below committed any substantial error. His charge was a clear and accurate presentation of the case, and taking the answer to the point in connection therewith, we are unable to see how the jury could have been misled. A discussion of the case is unnecessary.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A. 833, 154 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-schuylkill-river-east-side-r-r-pa-1893.