Baird v. Commissioner

1957 T.C. Memo. 192, 16 T.C.M. 867, 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 58
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baird v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 T.C. 387
United States Tax Court·Decided October 9, 1957·No. Docket Nos. 60132, 63907.·Unpublished

Opinion

Clifton E. Baird and Violet L. Baird v. Commissioner.
Baird v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 60132, 63907.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1957-192; 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 58; 16 T.C.M. (CCH) 867; T.C.M. (RIA) 57192;
October 9, 1957
*58 Lester M. Ponder, Esq., 1313 Merchants Bank Building, Indianapolis, Ind., and William L. Thompson, Esq., for the petitioners. Robert E. Johnson, Esq., for the respondent.

LEMIRE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

These consolidated proceedings involve deficiencies in income tax of petitioners as follows:

Docket No.YearDeficiency
601321952$16,499.72
195323,086.16
6390719547,434.72

The sole issue is whether certain amounts are taxable as income when earned and credited by finance companies to the dealer's reserve accounts of petitioners' accrual basis partnership. The other issue raised by the petition has been conceded by petitioners.

Findings of Fact

Most of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly.

Petitioners are husband and wife residing in Salem, Indiana. They filed joint returns for the calendar years involved with the district director of internal revenue for the district of Indiana, on the cash basis.

Petitioners are equal partners, doing business under the name Baird Trailer Sales, hereinafter referred to as the partnership. It has engaged, since its organization in January 1947, in the*59 sale of new and used mobile homes, usually referred to as house trailers, and to a lesser extent in new and used cars, parts and accessories, furniture, and real estate, in Salem, Indiana.

Partnership returns were filed for the fiscal years ended February 28, 1952, 1953, and 1954, and an amended return for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1952. The partnership kept its books and filed its income tax returns on an accrual method of accounting.

The partnership books reflected gross sales and cost of sales for the fiscal years ended February 28, 1952, 1953, and 1954, as follows:

195219531954
Gross
sales$1,025,943.89$1,337,385.64$1,067,144.18
Cost of
sales859,746.751,141,308.59908,027.87

During the taxable periods involved the partnership sold most of its trailers under conditional sales contracts. It sold such contracts to only three finance companies, namely: Minnehoma Financial Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma; Michigan National Bank, Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Midland Trailer Finance Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Minnehoma", "Michigan", and "Midland", and collectively referred to as the "Finance Company" or, the "Finance Companies. *60 " In such cases the purchaser executed a note payable to the partnership for the unpaid purchase price of the trailer, plus insurance, interest, and financing charges, and gave a chattel mortgage on the trailer as security. In the case of Minnehoma the contract took the place of the note payable.

Most of the notes accepted by the partnership in part payment for trailers were sold to one of the above-named companies in accordance with the terms of agreements between the partnership and each finance company. In the taxable years, the partnership handled its note business substantially with Midland.

The partnership and Minnehoma signed a document pertinent only to new trailer coaches manufactured by Spartan Aircraft Company, dated December 30, 1949, entitled "Agreement Covering Purchase of Conditional Sales Contracts" which contained inter alia, the following provisions:

"1. The Dealer shall not be obligated to sell any conditional sales contracts to Minnehoma, but may offer Minnehoma such contracts as the Dealer may from time to time choose, and Minnehoma shall not be obligated to purchase or acquire any contracts offered for sale and assignment by the Dealer, but shall purchase*61 only such contracts as it is willing to do. This agreement shall govern only the sale and assignment of such conditional sales contracts as the Dealer shall elect to sell and Minnehoma shall indicate its willingness to purchase and acquire.

* * *

"6. The purchase price of each conditional sale contract purchased by and assigned to Minnehoma hereunder shall be equal to the retail cash sales price of the trailer coach and all extra equipment plus all sums paid by the Dealer as required hereunder for sales and other taxes, extras and filing and recording fees less the amount of the down payment made by the purchaser in cash and/or by trade-in allowance.

"7. The Dealer unconditionally guarantees the payment of all sums required to be paid under each conditional sale contract purchased by and assigned to Minnehoma hereunder when such payment shall become due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baird v. Commissioner, 1957 T.C. Memo. 192, 16 T.C.M. 867, 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 58 (tax 1957).

1957 T.C. Memo. 192 (Baird v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.