Bain v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bain v. State

93 S.W.3d 761, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2144, 2002 WL 31416034

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bain v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2012 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2002·No. 80996·Published

Opinion

*762 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Keith Bain, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*762 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Keith Bain, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bain v. State, 93 S.W.3d 761, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2144, 2002 WL 31416034 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

93 S.W.3d 761 (Bain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.