Bain v. State
This text of 29 S.W.3d 414 (Bain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Keith Bain (Movant) appeals the judgment in his 29.15 motion denying his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to allow him to testify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the exclusive use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.W.3d 414, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1577, 2000 WL 1577066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bain-v-state-moctapp-2000.