Bain v. State
29 S.W.3d 414, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1577, 2000 WL 1577066
Opinion
ORDER
Keith Bain (Movant) appeals the judgment in his 29.15 motion denying his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to allow him to testify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the exclusive use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bain v. State, 29 S.W.3d 414, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1577, 2000 WL 1577066 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
29 S.W.3d 414 (Bain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bain v. State
59 S.W.3d 625 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)