Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.
188 P. 973, 96 Or. 32, 1920 Ore. LEXIS 143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Or. 1 →
Opinion
For the reasons stated in a former appeal, from an order requiring defendant to produce [33]*33its books (95 Or. 609, 188 Pac. 418), we bold that the order is not appealable. It is not a final order, which, in effect, determines the suit, but is a mere interlocutory order which must await the final determination of the suit before it can be reviewed here, if appealable at all: Clay v. Clay, 56 Or. 538 (108 Pac. 119, 109 Pac. 129).
The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co., 188 P. 973, 96 Or. 32, 1920 Ore. LEXIS 143 (Or. 1920).
188 P. 973 (Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clay v. Clay
108 P. 119 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1910)
Commercial National Bank v. Temple
109 P. 129 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1910)
Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.
188 P. 418 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)