Commercial National Bank v. Temple
This text of 109 P. 129 (Commercial National Bank v. Temple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
This is an appeal from Umatilla County. The transcript was filed November 18, 1909. On April 21, 1910, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and to affirm the judgment, for the reason that defendants have failed to file a brief within the 30 days after the filing of the transcript, as required by Rule 37 of this court, 50 Or. 589 (91 Pac. xii). There is no appearance upon this motion by defendant, and as no brief was filed by him, as required, the motion is allowed, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment affirmed. State v. Horn, 39 Or. 152 (65 Pac. 1066); Schafer v. Beecher, 54 Or. 273 (101 Pac. 899.) Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 P. 129, 56 Or. 543, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-national-bank-v-temple-or-1910.