Bailey's Appeal
5 A. 49, 1 Sadler 398, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 817
Opinion
A trustee should not be surcharged for a loss arising from a. mere error of judgment, when not guilty of any wilful neglect [399] or default. He certainly is not liable on a mere doubtful error of judgment. That appears to be the extent of the appellees’ offending in this case. There is no error in the decree.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey's Appeal, 5 A. 49, 1 Sadler 398, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 817 (Pa. 1886).
5 A. 49 (Bailey's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. Berryhill
N.D. California, 2019
James Harvey v. Robert F. Horan, Jr., Commonwealth's Attorney, County of Fairfax, Jennifer Thompson Karen R. Pomer Jeri Elster, Amici Curiae
278 F.3d 370 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)