Home/Mississippi Supreme Court/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

67 Miss. 333
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 67 Miss. 333 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. State, 67 Miss. 333 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant was perhaps convicted of an offense for which he was not indicted. It is manifest that he was indicted for selling whisky on an occasion known to and testified of by Quarrels; and, on cross-examination by the district-attorney, he was made to testify as to a transaction with respect to whisky, for which he may have been convicted, which was another and different occasion from that testified to by Quarrels. It is impossible to determine to which [335]*335occasion the verdict relates. The interrogation of the defendant as to an occasion different from that sworn to by Quarrels should not have been permitted. King v. The State, 66 Miss. 502.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. State
856 So. 2d 561 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2003)
Brent v. State
632 So. 2d 936 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1994)
Bailey v. State
110 So. 230 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. La Mont
120 N.W. 1104 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1909)
Thompson v. United States
30 App. D.C. 352 (D.C. Circuit, 1908)
State v. Shockley
80 P. 865 (Utah Supreme Court, 1905)
Naul v. McComb City
70 Miss. 699 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Miss. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-miss-1889.