Bailey v. State

184 So. 2d 892, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5752
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1966·No. No. G-495·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dancy v. State, 175 So.2d 208 (Fla.App.1965), Simpson v. State, 181 So.2d 185 (Fla.App.1966), and Bailey v. State, 173 So.2d 708 (Fla.App.1965).

RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 184 So. 2d 892, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

184 So. 2d 892 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soper v. Stine
184 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)