Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

173 So. 2d 708, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4476
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 1965
DocketNo. F-393
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 173 So. 2d 708 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. State, 173 So. 2d 708, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

While the appellant in his brief makes certain statements of fact which might, had they been properly alleged in a pleading and established in the record, have raised a justiciable issue, such facts are not so alleged or proved. Hence, since a brief is in no legal sense a pleading, it would be highly improper for us to consider such an issue based solely upon statements and arguments contained in the brief.

WIGGINTON, Acting Chief Judge, CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ANAMARIE M. SCHROEDER A/K/A ANAMARIA M. SCHROEDER, etc. v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Perkins v. Penson
44 Fla. Supp. 2d 32 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1990)
Suiero v. State
248 So. 2d 219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Bailey v. State
184 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 So. 2d 708, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.