Bailey v. O'Fallon

30 Colo. 418

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee, as plaintiff, brought an action in replevin against appellant, as defendant, to recover possession of a mare. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

Neither the character, amount of the judgment, nor the ■ questions involved necessary to a determination of the case confer jurisdiction upon this court to entertain the appeal. The judgment appealed from, however, is a judgment of the county court, and we therefore have jurisdiction to entertain it on error. For that reason, by virtue of the provisions of sec. 388a, Mills’ Annotated Code, the appeal is dismissed, and the canse will be redocketed on error^

Appeal dismissed.