Bailey v. O'Fallon
This text of 30 Colo. 418 (Bailey v. O'Fallon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee, as plaintiff, brought an action in replevin against appellant, as defendant, to recover possession of a mare. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
Neither the character, amount of the judgment, nor the ■ questions involved necessary to a determination of the case confer jurisdiction upon this court to entertain the appeal. The judgment appealed from, however, is a judgment of the county court, and we therefore have jurisdiction to entertain it on error. For that reason, by virtue of the provisions [419]*419of sec. 388a, Mills’ Annotated Code, the appeal is dismissed, and the canse will be redocketed on error^
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Colo. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-ofallon-colo-1902.