Bailey v. . Light Co.

195 S.E. 64, 212 N.C. 768, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 231
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 2, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 S.E. 64 (Bailey v. . Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. . Light Co., 195 S.E. 64, 212 N.C. 768, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 231 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

This is an action for judgment restraining and enjoining the defendants Carolina Power Light Company and Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation from consummating or performing an agreement, in writing, which was entered into by and between said defendants on 8 July, 1937, on the ground (1) that said agreement, by reason of its provisions, is in violation of certain statutes declaring the public policy of this State with respect to such agreements, and is for that reason unlawful and void; and (2) that said agreement, if consummated and performed by said defendants, will wrongfully and unlawfully deprive the plaintiffs and other residents of certain rural communities of Johnston County, North Carolina, of their right to have electric service furnished to them by the defendant Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation, in accordance with the provisions of its charter or certificate of incorporation, if and when they shall desire such service.

The action was begun in the Superior Court of Johnston County on 7 August, 1937. It was heard by consent of the parties by Judge Grady at his chambers in the town of Clinton, N.C. on 20 August, 1937, on an order duly served on the defendants to show cause why a temporary restraining order made in the action should not be continued until the final hearing.

At this hearing Judge Grady found the facts as set out in the judgment which he rendered as follows:

"1. Summons was issued herein on 7 August, 1937, and was duly served on all the defendants, who have appeared and filed answers to the complaint filed in the action by the plaintiffs.

"2. The plaintiffs are farmers, residing in rural sections of Johnston County. The Carolina Power Light Company is a corporation and as such is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling electric energy, with its principal office in the city of Raleigh, N.C.; Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation is a corporation created under and by virtue of the provisions of chapters 288 and 291, Public Laws of North Carolina, 1935; the defendants J. W. Woodard, Snead Sanders, A. J. Whitley, Jr., and W. T. Scott are residents of Johnston County, and constitute a majority of the board of directors of the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation.

"3. On 27 May, 1936, pursuant to letters received by and personal appeals made to them, a number of rural citizens of Johnston County *Page 770 met in the office of S.C. Oliver, county farm agent, there being present at said meeting from 42 to 55 persons; 51 projects for the electrification of rural districts of Johnston County were represented at said meeting. J. W. Woodard, A. F. Holt, Jr., Dr. Wade H. Atkinson, A. J. Whitley, Jr., Ira C. Whitley, Snead Sanders, and Cheater Barbour were duly elected as directors of a corporation to be formed for the electrification of the several rural sections of the county represented at said meeting. Said directors met immediately after the meeting and elected J. W. Woodard as chairman and A. F. Holt, Jr., as secretary of the board. All three of the plaintiffs were present at said meeting.

"4. At a meeting of the board of directors held on 27 May, 1936, it was ordered that a corporation be formed under the law to be known as the Electric Membership Corporation of Johnston County. Full authority was requested and given to them for such corporate organization by the North Carolina Rural Electrification Authority, and thereafter a certificate of incorporation was issued by the Secretary of State and duly recorded in Johnston County. Said permit was issued on 16 June, 1936, and the Certificate of Incorporation was issued from the office of the Secretary of State on the same day. It is recorded in Corporation Book No. 3, at page 231, of Johnston County.

"5. On 23 June, 1936, a construction loan contract was entered into between the Federal Rural Electrification Administration and the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation, under which the United States Government was to lend the sum of $80,000.00 for the construction of the first part of the Johnston County project, consisting of approximately three hundred miles of electric lines.

"On 14 August, 1936, the Federal Rural Electrification Authority at Washington City increased its offer to lend to $310,000.00; and a mortgage was executed by the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation to the Federal Government to secure said loan, which mortgage is recorded in Book 361, at page 226, of Johnston County registry, which record is made a part of this finding of fact.

"This contract with the Federal Rural Electrification Authority was made for the benefit of something like 1,500 citizens residing in the rural and unelectrified portions of Johnston County and parts of Wake County and other territory referred to in the minutes of the board of directors of the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation.

"6. On 21 September, 1936, the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation entered into a contract with the Thompson Electrical Company of Raleigh for the construction of the first section of the project of the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation, consisting of seventy-seven miles of electric lines; and this contract was approved by the Federal Rural Electrification Authority. *Page 771

"7. In June, 1936, the Carolina Power Light Company began the construction of electric lines in Johnston County, paralleling those intended to be constructed by the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation.

"Suits were instituted in the Superior Courts of this State, one by the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation against the Carolina Power Light Company and one by the Carolina Power Light Company against the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation.

"The court is of the opinion that these two suits, and their final outcome, have nothing to do with the rights of the parties in this action; but in case the facts may be deemed material, the records in said two causes are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as fully as if set out in detail.

"8. On 8 July, 1937, the defendants' board of directors, without requesting authority therefor from the 40 or 50 men who originally elected them, accepted a proposition from the Carolina Power Light Company, the said proposition and acceptance being as follows:

"`RALEIGH, N.C. 8 July, 1937.

"`THE JOHNSTON COUNTY ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, SMITHFIELD, N.C.

"`DEAR SIR: As a compromise of the controversy between you and the Carolina Power Light Company as to providing rural electrification in Johnston County, we offer to you, for your consideration and acceptance, the following as conditions of settlement:

"`1. The Carolina Power Light Company shall immediately resume the construction of rural electric distribution lines in Johnston County, and shall diligently pursue such construction until it has completed and placed in operation 325 miles of such lines, which shall include the 221 miles of lines on company's present program, and 104 miles which shall be selected and located by a majority of the board of directors of the Johnston County Electric Membership Corporation as now constituted, and shall be the lines which in their judgment are most desirable and feasible. Rights of way for such 104 miles shall be furnished to the company without cost. The 325 miles of line as provided for herein shall not include the lines built prior to 1936, but shall be in addition thereto. Such 325 miles are to be completed during 1937.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Self v. Self
286 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Beech Mountain Property Owners' Ass'n v. Current
240 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.E. 64, 212 N.C. 768, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-light-co-nc-1938.