Bailey v. Celebrezze

338 F.2d 339
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 9, 1964·No. No. 21237·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant1 complains of the action of the trial court in affirming the decision of the Hearing Examiner denying claim for Social Security benefits. We are convinced that the facts found by the Hearing Examiner are supported by substantial evidence and that the legal conclusions reached are supported by the facts so found. Accordingly, we fail to find error in the action of the trial court affirming the decision of the Hearing Examiner.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Celebrezze, 338 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1964).

338 F.2d 339 (Bailey v. Celebrezze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Celebrezze
338 F.2d 339 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)