Bailey v. . Caldwell

68 N.C. 471

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. . Caldwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 N.C. 472 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1873·Published

Opinion

The questions in this case are substantially the same as in Nichols v.McKee, ante, 429 and Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 457, and are governed by the same principles and for the same reasons.

There will be judgment that the defendants be excluded from said office, and that the plaintiffs recover cost.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 465; Brown v. Turner, 70 N.C. 107;Day's case, 124 N.C. 377.

(472)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The questions in this case are substantially the same as in Nichols v.McKee, ante, 429 and Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 457, and are governed by the same principles and for the same reasons.

There will be judgment that the defendants be excluded from said office, and that the plaintiffs recover cost.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 465; Brown v. Turner, 70 N.C. 107;Day's case, 124 N.C. 377.

(472)

Bailey v. . Caldwell, 68 N.C. 471 (N.C. 1873).

Pincite

68 N.C. 471 (Bailey v. . Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State Prison of N. C. v. Day

124 N.C. 362 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)

Opinion

Related