Bailey v. Caldwell

68 N.C. 472
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Readb, J.

The case of Cotton v. Ellis, 7 Jones 545, is di[475]*475rectly in point. Cotton had been appointed Adjutant General for three years, with a salary of $200. The Legislature passed an act repealing the law under which Cotton had been appointed, both as to his appointment and salary. Cotton served out his term and demanded pay, which the Governor, Ellis, refused. And this Court decided that he-was entitled to it. The principles of that case are the same as in this, and it is unnecessary to repeat them. See also King v. Hunter, 65 N. C. Rep. 603.

There is no error.

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Caldwell, 68 N.C. 472 (N.C. 1873).

68 N.C. 472 (Bailey v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee County
97 S.E. 758 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Mial v. Ellington.
46 S.E. 961 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
State Ex Rel. Walser v. Bellamy
27 S.E. 113 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)