Bailey v. . Caldwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bailey v. . Caldwell

68 N.C. 471

DecidedJanuary 5, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 68 N.C. 471 (Bailey v. . Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. . Caldwell, 68 N.C. 471 (N.C. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

The questions in this case are substantially the same as in Nichols v.McKee, ante, 429 and Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 457, and are governed by the same principles and for the same reasons.

There will be judgment that the defendants be excluded from said office, and that the plaintiffs recover cost.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 465; Brown v. Turner, 70 N.C. 107;Day's case, 124 N.C. 377.

(472)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The questions in this case are substantially the same as in Nichols v.McKee, ante, 429 and Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 457, and are governed by the same principles and for the same reasons.

There will be judgment that the defendants be excluded from said office, and that the plaintiffs recover cost.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Welker v. Bledsoe, ante, 465; Brown v. Turner, 70 N.C. 107;Day's case, 124 N.C. 377.

(472)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 N.C. 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-caldwell-nc-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack