Bailey v. ABERNATHIE
This text of 157 S.W.3d 725 (Bailey v. ABERNATHIE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John D. BAILEY, D.O., Appellant,
v.
Dennis J. ABERNATHIE, et al, R. Ray Cunningham, Robert W. Gaines, Thomas R. Highland, Joel T. Jeffries, John T. Oro, Randal R. Trecha, Curators of the University of Missouri, Columbia Orthopedic Group, Llp., Respondents.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Seth D. Shumaker, Esq., Kirksville, MO, Audrey H. McIntosh, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.
Jeffrey O. Parshall, Esq., Susan F. Robertson, Esq., Columbia, MO, for Respondent Robert Cunningham and Randal Trecha.
Glen R. Ehrhardt, Esq., Columbia, MO, for Respondent Thomas Highland, Columbia Orthopedic Group, Llp, and Joel Jeffries.
William F. Arnet, Esq., Katharine S. Bunn, Esq., Columbia, MO, for Respondent Curators of the University of Missouri, Robert Gaines and John Oro.
*726 Before HARDWICK, P.J., ULRICH and NEWTON, JJ.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 1, 2005.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John Bailey appeals from the entry of summary judgment on his breach of contract claim. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court's judgment. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.W.3d 725, 2004 WL 2933813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-abernathie-moctapp-2004.