Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, GP

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, GP

DecidedMarch 27, 2025

Docket11-23-00136-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, GP (Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, GP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, GP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC, * From the 266th District Court of Erath County, Trial Court No. CV34950.

Vs. No. 11-23-00136-CV * March 27, 2025

Clark, Love & Hutson, GP, * Opinion by Bailey, C.J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the trial court’s order of June 12, 2023, by vacating the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Clark, Love & Hutson, GP. As modified, we affirm the order of the trial court. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 50% against Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC and 50% against Clark, Love, & Hutson, GP.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC, * From the 266th District Court of Erath County, Trial Court No. CV34950.

Vs. No. 11-23-00136-CV * March 27, 2025

Clark, Love & Hutson, GP, * Opinion by Bailey, C.J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the trial court’s order of June 12, 2023, by vacating the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Clark, Love & Hutson, GP. As modified, we affirm the order of the trial court. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 50% against Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC and 50% against Clark, Love, & Hutson, GP.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, GP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-cowan-heckaman-pllc-v-clark-love-hutson-gp-texapp-2025.