Bailes v. Bailes

124 So. 215, 220 Ala. 178, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 20, 1929
Docket7 Div. 888.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 124 So. 215 (Bailes v. Bailes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailes v. Bailes, 124 So. 215, 220 Ala. 178, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 416 (Ala. 1929).

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In the recent case of Smith v. Smith (Ala. Sup.) 120 So. 167, 1 it was ruled that a decree denying a petition to modify a final decree granting alimony was such final decree as would support an appeal. The merits of petitioner’s case were presented in the companion case brought here by appeal, ante, p. 177, 124 So. 214, with the result that the mandamus must be denied.

Mandamus denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1

218 Ala. 701.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Sharp
68 So. 2d 545 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Estes
181 So. 775 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Home Ins. Co. v. Shriner
177 So. 897 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Aiken v. Aiken
127 So. 819 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 215, 220 Ala. 178, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailes-v-bailes-ala-1929.