Baiko v. Baiko
140 A.D.2d 399, 528 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4971
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baiko v. Baiko. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 A.D.2d 635 →
Opinion
[400]*400The court erred in granting summary judgment on the record herein. Under the circumstances, a hearing is required to determine the equitable considerations involved in partition of the former marital residence (see, Ripp v Ripp, 38 AD2d 65, affd 32 NY2d 755) and factual disputes exist which preclude summary judgment (see, Gasko v Del Ventura, 96 AD2d 896, appeal dismissed 61 NY2d 669; cf., Schechter v Schechter, 73 AD2d 614). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baiko v. Baiko, 140 A.D.2d 399, 528 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 399 (Baiko v. Baiko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ripp v. Ripp
298 N.E.2d 114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
Weil v. McClough
460 N.E.2d 230 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Ripp v. Ripp
38 A.D.2d 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Schechter v. Schechter
73 A.D.2d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Gasko v. Del Ventura
96 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)