Bahrey v. Poniatishin
112 A. 481, 95 N.J.L. 128, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 249
Opinions
The judgment, under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam in the Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bahrey v. Poniatishin, 112 A. 481, 95 N.J.L. 128, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 249 (N.J. 1920).
112 A. 481 (Bahrey v. Poniatishin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
US Bank Cust for Pc7 Firstrust Bank v. Block 5.04, Lot 16, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2023
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DEVON STOUT (17-10-1463, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DANIEL M. PAGE(15-043, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017
Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc.
677 A.2d 705 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Skripek v. Bergamo
491 A.2d 1336 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
State v. Scioscia
490 A.2d 327 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Fox v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills
488 A.2d 557 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
State v. Parsons
200 A.2d 340 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Carolyn Mullen v. United States
263 F.2d 275 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
Roth v. Protos
1 A.2d 10 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)
Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals
194 A. 870 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
International Dye & Print Works v. Fashion Screen Printing Co.
186 A. 467 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)
In Re Contempt of Emil Swenson
237 N.W. 589 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1931)