Bagwell v. Cash

60 S.E.2d 628, 207 Ga. 222, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 437
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 11, 1950
Docket17110
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 60 S.E.2d 628 (Bagwell v. Cash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bagwell v. Cash, 60 S.E.2d 628, 207 Ga. 222, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 437 (Ga. 1950).

Opinions

Head, Justice.

1. “Powers of all public officers are defined by law, and all persons must take notice thereof. The public may not be estopped by the acts of any officer done in the exercise of a power not conferred.” Code, § 89-903.

2. County boards of tax assessors are limited by law in the employment [223]*223of agents. Such agents may be employed to seek out unreturned property for taxation. They may be paid a commission not exceeding 10% of the county and school tax on returned property placed on the digest “by the efforts of said agents.” Code (Ann.), Chapter 92-69, § 92-6910 (Ga. L. 1913, p. 123, as amended, Ga. L. 1937, p. 517). The Board of Tax Assessors of Hall County can not delegate its duties pertaining to the equalization of property valuations for ad valorem taxation, nor can the board contract for services of the nature stipulated in the contract executed by the board.

No. 17110. July 11, 1950. Rehearing denied July 24, 1950.

3. The Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Hall County has neither express nor implied authority to contract with reference to any of the powers and duties of the Board of Tax Assessors of Hall County. Ga. L. 1935, p. 661; Decatur County v. Roberts, 159. Ga. 528 (126 S. E. 460).

4. Constitutional questions will not be decided by this court unless a ruling thereon is essential in the determination of the cause.

5. The trial court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Duckworth, C.J., concurs specially. [224]*224A. R. Kenyon and Kenyon, Kenyon & Gunter, for plaintiffs in error. Stow & Royal and G. Fred Kelley, contra. Emory F. Robinson, amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Austin
607 S.E.2d 569 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)
Forsyth County v. Childers
525 S.E.2d 390 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Cross v. State
171 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Harper v. Burgess
169 S.E.2d 297 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Graves v. Wall
79 S.E.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Hutchins v. Candler
73 S.E.2d 191 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Ezzard v. City of Lawrenceville
63 S.E.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Bagwell v. Cash
60 S.E.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.E.2d 628, 207 Ga. 222, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagwell-v-cash-ga-1950.