Bagley v. State

135 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 1292437, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5815
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bagley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14988
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 2012·No. No. 1D12-1481·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied. See Kokal v. State, 901 So.2d 766, 777 (Fla.2005) (“We have repeatedly held that claims of ineffective assistance of postcon-viction counsel are not cognizable.”). Although an initial brief was not timely filed in petitioner’s postconviction appeal, this court independently reviewed the merits of the claims when we denied relief in Bagley v. State, 51 So.3d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

BENTON, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bagley v. State, 135 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 1292437, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5815 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

135 So. 3d 299 (Bagley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokal v. State
901 So. 2d 766 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)