Bagley v. State

135 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 1292437, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5815
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 2012
DocketNo. 1D12-1481
StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 3d 299 (Bagley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bagley v. State, 135 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 1292437, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5815 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied. See Kokal v. State, 901 So.2d 766, 777 (Fla.2005) (“We have repeatedly held that claims of ineffective assistance of postcon-viction counsel are not cognizable.”). Although an initial brief was not timely filed in petitioner’s postconviction appeal, this court independently reviewed the merits of the claims when we denied relief in Bagley v. State, 51 So.3d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

BENTON, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kokal v. State
901 So. 2d 766 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 1292437, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagley-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.