Bagby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

RODERICK BAGBY, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-413-RAW-JAR ) STATE FARM MUTUAL ) AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., ) ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the court is the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in which he recommended that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted. No objection has been filed and the time allotted for doing so has expired. “In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir.1991). The court agrees with the reasoning of the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and recommendation and finds that “there is no clear error on the face of the record.” See Rule 72(b) F.R.Cv.P., advisory committee note. It is the order of the court that the Findings and Recommendation (#37) is affirmed and adopted as the order of the court. Defendant’s

motion to dismiss (#17) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of SEPTEMBER, 2025.

_________________________________ RONALD A. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE