Badenhop v. Woolford

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Badenhop v. Woolford

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 372

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedMay 24, 1734

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 372 (Badenhop v. Woolford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badenhop v. Woolford, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 372 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1734).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. Rutledge of Counsel for the Plaintiff, and on reading the Report made by the Master of this Court in this Cause, It is Ordered that the Defendant do file his Exceptions by the first day of August next ensuing, Or that the Said Report and all Matters and things therein contained be then Confirmed, And that the Papers Books and Accounts relating to this Cause be returned by the Master to the Register’s Office of this Court.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. Rutledge of Counsel for the Plaintiff, and on reading the Report made by the Master of this Court in this Cause, It is Ordered that the Defendant do file his Exceptions by the first day of August next ensuing, Or that the Said Report and all Matters and things therein contained be then Confirmed, And that the Papers Books and Accounts relating to this Cause be returned by the Master to the Register’s Office of this Court.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badenhop-v-woolford-ctchansc-1734.