Baccash v. Baccash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baccash v. Baccash

231 A.D.2d 714, 647 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 714 (Baccash v. Baccash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baccash v. Baccash, 231 A.D.2d 714, 647 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In a family offense [715]*715proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the wife appeals by permission, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated April 17, 1996, as granted that branch of the husband’s motion which was to transfer venue to Kings County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find no basis for disturbing the court’s determination granting the husband’s motion to transfer venue. While the wife properly originated her family offense proceeding in Rock-land County (see, Family Ct Act § 818), the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in finding that good cause existed to support a transfer of the proceeding to Family Court in Kings County, where venue was also proper (see, Family Ct Act §§ 174, 818). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a family offense [715]*715proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the wife appeals by permission, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated April 17, 1996, as granted that branch of the husband’s motion which was to transfer venue to Kings County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find no basis for disturbing the court’s determination granting the husband’s motion to transfer venue. While the wife properly originated her family offense proceeding in Rock-land County (see, Family Ct Act § 818), the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in finding that good cause existed to support a transfer of the proceeding to Family Court in Kings County, where venue was also proper (see, Family Ct Act §§ 174, 818). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 714, 647 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baccash-v-baccash-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack