Baca v. United States

Court of Claims

Baca v. United States

150 Ct. Cl. 70, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 109, 1960 WL 8519

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJune 8, 1960

DocketNo. 489-57

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 150 Ct. Cl. 70 (Baca v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baca v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 70, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 109, 1960 WL 8519 (cc 1960).

Pincite

Opinions

Pee CuRIam:

This case, which is a suit by plaintiffs as civilian bus drivers at a military post to recover overtime compensation, was referred under Rule 45(a) to Mastín G. White, a trial commissioner of this court, with directions to make findings of fact and to recommend conclusions of law which the commissioner has done in a report filed November 10, 1959.

The court having considered the evidence, the briefs and argument of counsel and being in agreement with the recommendations of the commissioner hereby adopts his opinion and findings which are hereinafter set forth as the basis for its judgment in this case. Plaintiffs Jose V. Baca (1), Floyd B. Campbell (4), J. E. Jones (13), Rodolpho Martinez (17) and James M. Simpson (22) are entitled to recover and judgment will be entered to that effect with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c). Plaintiffs Vemey R. Bunch (3), Cecil R. Gillespie (9), Werttie L. Haney (12) and Vick V. Serna (21) are not entitled to recover, and the petition as to them will be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CuRIam:

This case, which is a suit by plaintiffs as civilian bus drivers at a military post to recover overtime compensation, was referred under Rule 45(a) to Mastín G. White, a trial commissioner of this court, with directions to make findings of fact and to recommend conclusions of law which the commissioner has done in a report filed November 10, 1959.

The court having considered the evidence, the briefs and argument of counsel and being in agreement with the recommendations of the commissioner hereby adopts his opinion and findings which are hereinafter set forth as the basis for its judgment in this case. Plaintiffs Jose V. Baca (1), Floyd B. Campbell (4), J. E. Jones (13), Rodolpho Martinez (17) and James M. Simpson (22) are entitled to recover and judgment will be entered to that effect with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c). Plaintiffs Vemey R. Bunch (3), Cecil R. Gillespie (9), Werttie L. Haney (12) and Vick V. Serna (21) are not entitled to recover, and the petition as to them will be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 Ct. Cl. 70, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 109, 1960 WL 8519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baca-v-united-states-cc-1960.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack