Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford
This text of 606 So. 2d 451 (Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kathleen BAAD, Appellant,
v.
SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD and Norwood Shell, Inc., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*452 Neil Rose, Dunn & Johnson and Steven M. Dunn, Miami, for appellant.
Touby Smith DeMahy & Drake and Kenneth R. Drake, Miami, for appellee Sec. Ins. Co.
No appearance for appellee Norwood Shell, Inc.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We agree with appellant that genuine issues of material fact remain to be resolved in this case thereby precluding summary judgment for the defendant insurance company. Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1985); Connelly v. Arrow Air, 568 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 1991); Francoeur v. Pipers, Inc., 560 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 So. 2d 451, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10480, 1992 WL 260987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baad-v-security-ins-co-of-hartford-fladistctapp-1992.