Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8351, 1993 WL 302321
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1993·No. No. 93-103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of a disputed issue of material fact concerning the design and manufacture of the package in question, the entry of a summary judgment by the trial court in this case was error. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, 606 So.2d 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8351, 1993 WL 302321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

621 So. 2d 1093 (Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford
606 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)