Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp.
This text of 621 So. 2d 1093 (Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of a disputed issue of material fact concerning the design and manufacture of the package in question, the entry of a summary judgment by the trial court in this case was error. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, 606 So.2d 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8351, 1993 WL 302321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antulich-v-anchor-hocking-corp-fladistctapp-1993.