Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8351, 1993 WL 302321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 10, 1993
DocketNo. 93-103
StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 1093 (Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antulich v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8351, 1993 WL 302321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of a disputed issue of material fact concerning the design and manufacture of the package in question, the entry of a summary judgment by the trial court in this case was error. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, 606 So.2d 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford
606 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8351, 1993 WL 302321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antulich-v-anchor-hocking-corp-fladistctapp-1993.