Home/D.C. Circuit/Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh

Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh

958 F.2d 1089, 294 U.S. App. D.C. 231, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3377
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 3, 1992·No. Nos. 88-5226, 90-5293·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

[232]*232ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellees’ Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Chief Judge MIKVA and Circuit Judges WALD, HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and BUCKLEY would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge WALD, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh, 958 F.2d 1089, 294 U.S. App. D.C. 231, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3377 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

958 F.2d 1089 (Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naranjo-Aguilera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
30 F.3d 1106 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Naranjo-Aguilera v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
30 F.3d 1106 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Ayuda, Inc. v. Janet Reno, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States, (Two Cases). Ayuda, Inc. v. Janet Reno
7 F.3d 246 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Individually, and as Attorney General of the United States, Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Individually, and as Attorney General of the United States, Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh
958 F.2d 1089 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)