Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh

D.C. Circuit

Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh

958 F.2d 1089, 294 U.S. App. D.C. 231, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3377

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1992

DocketNos. 88-5226, 90-5293

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 958 F.2d 1089 (Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh, 958 F.2d 1089, 294 U.S. App. D.C. 231, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3377 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinions

[232]*232ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellees’ Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Chief Judge MIKVA and Circuit Judges WALD, HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and BUCKLEY would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge WALD, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI