Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1217
ANGELA AYRES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. WARD; JACOB GEESING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02077-RWT)
Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela Ayres, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Newman Strandberg, REBECCA STRANDBERG & ASSOCIATES, PA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order
granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative,
for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, No. 8:09-cv-
02077-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC (Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.