Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 396 F. App'x 47
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2010·No. 10-1217·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1217

ANGELA AYRES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. WARD; JACOB GEESING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02077-RWT)

Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Ayres, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Newman Strandberg, REBECCA STRANDBERG & ASSOCIATES, PA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order

granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative,

for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, No. 8:09-cv-

02077-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, (4th Cir. 2010).

Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC (Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.