Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC

Fourth Circuit

Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC

396 F. App'x 47

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2010·No. No. 10-1217·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, No. 8:09-cv-02077-RWT, 2010 WL 481355 (D.Md. Feb. 5, 2010). [48]*48We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, No. 8:09-cv-02077-RWT, 2010 WL 481355 (D.Md. Feb. 5, 2010). [48]*48We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, 396 F. App'x 47 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

396 F. App'x 47 (Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related