Aylmer v. New Hampshire Savings Bank

262 N.W. 257, 195 Minn. 661, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 919
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedAugust 30, 1935
DocketNo. 30,638.
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 262 N.W. 257 (Aylmer v. New Hampshire Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aylmer v. New Hampshire Savings Bank, 262 N.W. 257, 195 Minn. 661, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 919 (Mich. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court having granted a writ of certiorari herein on plaintiff’s petition to review a proceeding under L. 1935, c. 47, the defendant and respondent moves this court on August 29, 1935, upon the. files and records herein, that plaintiff, during the pendency of this proceeding, pay to the clerk of the district court of Hennepin county the several sums of money at the time specified in order of the court below to be paid to defendant, or, in lieu thereof, that plaintiff file an adequate supersedeas bond.

Now having considered the motion and plaintiff’s objection thereto, and being of the opinion that the $250 undertaking for costs is not adequate protection for defendant, who under the decision below waá to be paid $250 monthly by plaintiff as a condition for having the time to redeem from the foreclosure extended; and, as the court below is perhaps without power to protect, since certiorari operates as supersedeas (State v. Noonan, 24 Minn. 124), it is ordered that plaintiff, within ten days after notice of this order, file in this court a supersedeas bond, duly approved by the court below, in the sum of $1,500, or, in lieu of such bond, pay to the clerk of the district court of Hennepin county the several sums of money specified by the order of the court below to be paid to defendant, including the payments now in default. In the event that plaintiff neither files a bond as hereby ordered nor makes the payments as herein directed within ten days from notice hereof, the writ of certiorari herein will be recalled and the decision below stand affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vicki L. Blasing v. Zurich American Ins. Co.
2014 WI 73 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2014)
Indiana & Mich. Elec. Co. v. WHITLEY CTY. REM
312 N.E.2d 503 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1974)
City of Kiowa v. Central Telephone & Utilities Corp.
515 P.2d 795 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1973)
Travelers Insurance v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society
221 Cal. App. 2d 150 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Frye v. Theige
34 N.W.2d 793 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1948)
Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.
165 P.2d 741 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Lake Superior District Power Co. v. Public Service Commission
13 N.W.2d 89 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1944)
Lasecki v. Kabara
294 N.W. 33 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1940)
Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Public Service Commission
286 N.W. 581 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1939)
Hardtner v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.
189 So. 365 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)
Wisconsin Public Service Corp. v. Public Service Commission
284 N.W. 582 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1939)
Munsert v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance
281 N.W. 671 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 N.W. 257, 195 Minn. 661, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aylmer-v-new-hampshire-savings-bank-minn-1935.