9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10
11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 AYKAK KARAPETYAN, ET AL., Case No. 2:24-cv-05838-SPG (AGRx) 13 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14
15 v. NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT 16 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ET AL.,
17 Defendants.1 18
19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, 21 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 22 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted, including case- 23 specific, asylum-related, or private information relating to Plaintiffs. Accordingly, the 24 parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 25
26 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Joseph B. Edlow is substituted 27 for Ur M. Jaddou as the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Kristi Noem is substituted for Alejandro Mayorkas; and Pamela Bondi is substituted for Merrick 1 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 2 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 3 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 4 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 5 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 6 This action is likely to involve: (i) information, documents or tangible things 7 protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, et seq., or information that would be 8 covered by the Privacy Act if the subject of the information had been a U.S. citizen or a 9 person lawfully admitted for permanent residence; (ii) information, documents or tangible 10 things—which may include, among other things, Department of Homeland Security 11 (“DHS”), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), and U.S. Citizenship and 12 Immigration Services (“USCIS”) records regarding law enforcement activities and 13 operations, internal policies, processes and procedures, and internal investigations—which 14 contain information that is law enforcement sensitive, for instance, information which 15 would be protected from disclosure under Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, et 16 seq., under the exemption found at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(E); (iii) information contained in 17 or pertaining to asylum claims or applications, including applications for relief under the 18 Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and refugee information; (iv) any identifying 19 information that is not publicly available and qualifies for protection under applicable law, 20 statutes or regulations (including 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.6, 1208.6(a)), including, but not limited 21 to, the names, addresses, date of birth, and “A” number of the particular individual to 22 whom information relates, any other personally identifiable information identified in 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and any personally identifiable information related to 24 third parties other than the individual whose information is being sought; and (v) any other 25 information that is protected or restricted from disclosure by Court order, statutes, or 26 regulations, including but not limited to: 8 U.S.C. §§ 1202(f), 1304(b), and 1367(a)(2), 27 (b), (c), (d); 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.6, 244.16, 245a.21, 1003.46, and 1208.6, which otherwise 1 could subject either party to civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions in the event of 2 unauthorized disclosure. 3 Specifically, on October 14, 2025, Defendants will file the Certified Administrative 4 Record (“CAR”) of Plaintiff Aykak’s asylum application, which was filed with United 5 States Citizenship and Immigration Services on August 16, 2021. See Order (ECF No. 32); 6 Answer (ECF No. 24) ¶ 11. The CAR is likely to contain personally identifiable 7 information and information regarding Plaintiff Aykak’s asylum application including 8 information regarding his prior persecution and fear of future persecution that is protected 9 by law. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.6 (governing the disclosure of information contained in or 10 pertaining to any asylum application). Disclosure of asylum-related information may 11 subject an asylum applicant to retaliatory measures by government authorities or non-state 12 actors in the event that an asylum applicant is repatriated, or endanger the security of the 13 applicant’s family members still residing in the applicant’s country of origin. See USCIS 14 Asylum Division, Fact Sheet: Federal Regulation Protecting the Confidentiality of 15 Asylum Applicants (Oct. 18, 2012), 16 https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/fact-sheets/Asylum- 17 ConfidentialityFactSheet.pdf. 18 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution 19 of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information 20 the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 21 reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, 22 to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a 23 protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties 24 that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing 25 be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 26 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record 27 of this case. 1 C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL 2 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 3 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle the parties to file confidential information 4 under seal. Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 5 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material 6 under seal. 7 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 8 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good 9 cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 10 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Makar-Welbon v. Sony Elecs., Inc., 187 11 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause 12 showing). A specific showing of good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary 13 support and legal justification, must be made with respect to protected material that a party 14 seeks to file under seal. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th 15 Cir. 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10
11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 AYKAK KARAPETYAN, ET AL., Case No. 2:24-cv-05838-SPG (AGRx) 13 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14
15 v. NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT 16 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ET AL.,
17 Defendants.1 18
19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, 21 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 22 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted, including case- 23 specific, asylum-related, or private information relating to Plaintiffs. Accordingly, the 24 parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 25
26 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Joseph B. Edlow is substituted 27 for Ur M. Jaddou as the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Kristi Noem is substituted for Alejandro Mayorkas; and Pamela Bondi is substituted for Merrick 1 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 2 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 3 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 4 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 5 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 6 This action is likely to involve: (i) information, documents or tangible things 7 protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, et seq., or information that would be 8 covered by the Privacy Act if the subject of the information had been a U.S. citizen or a 9 person lawfully admitted for permanent residence; (ii) information, documents or tangible 10 things—which may include, among other things, Department of Homeland Security 11 (“DHS”), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), and U.S. Citizenship and 12 Immigration Services (“USCIS”) records regarding law enforcement activities and 13 operations, internal policies, processes and procedures, and internal investigations—which 14 contain information that is law enforcement sensitive, for instance, information which 15 would be protected from disclosure under Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, et 16 seq., under the exemption found at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(E); (iii) information contained in 17 or pertaining to asylum claims or applications, including applications for relief under the 18 Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and refugee information; (iv) any identifying 19 information that is not publicly available and qualifies for protection under applicable law, 20 statutes or regulations (including 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.6, 1208.6(a)), including, but not limited 21 to, the names, addresses, date of birth, and “A” number of the particular individual to 22 whom information relates, any other personally identifiable information identified in 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and any personally identifiable information related to 24 third parties other than the individual whose information is being sought; and (v) any other 25 information that is protected or restricted from disclosure by Court order, statutes, or 26 regulations, including but not limited to: 8 U.S.C. §§ 1202(f), 1304(b), and 1367(a)(2), 27 (b), (c), (d); 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.6, 244.16, 245a.21, 1003.46, and 1208.6, which otherwise 1 could subject either party to civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions in the event of 2 unauthorized disclosure. 3 Specifically, on October 14, 2025, Defendants will file the Certified Administrative 4 Record (“CAR”) of Plaintiff Aykak’s asylum application, which was filed with United 5 States Citizenship and Immigration Services on August 16, 2021. See Order (ECF No. 32); 6 Answer (ECF No. 24) ¶ 11. The CAR is likely to contain personally identifiable 7 information and information regarding Plaintiff Aykak’s asylum application including 8 information regarding his prior persecution and fear of future persecution that is protected 9 by law. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.6 (governing the disclosure of information contained in or 10 pertaining to any asylum application). Disclosure of asylum-related information may 11 subject an asylum applicant to retaliatory measures by government authorities or non-state 12 actors in the event that an asylum applicant is repatriated, or endanger the security of the 13 applicant’s family members still residing in the applicant’s country of origin. See USCIS 14 Asylum Division, Fact Sheet: Federal Regulation Protecting the Confidentiality of 15 Asylum Applicants (Oct. 18, 2012), 16 https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/fact-sheets/Asylum- 17 ConfidentialityFactSheet.pdf. 18 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution 19 of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information 20 the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 21 reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, 22 to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a 23 protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties 24 that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing 25 be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 26 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record 27 of this case. 1 C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL 2 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 3 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle the parties to file confidential information 4 under seal. Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 5 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material 6 under seal. 7 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 8 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good 9 cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 10 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Makar-Welbon v. Sony Elecs., Inc., 187 11 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause 12 showing). A specific showing of good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary 13 support and legal justification, must be made with respect to protected material that a party 14 seeks to file under seal. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th 15 Cir. 2002). The parties’ mere designation of disclosure of discovery material as 16 confidential does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, 17 establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, 18 privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 19 1182. 20 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 21 compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief 22 sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos 23 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of 24 information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal in connection 25 with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling 26 reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. 27 Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must 1 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its 2 entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 3 documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the 4 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document shall be filed. 5 Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should include an 6 explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 7 2. DEFINITIONS 8 2.1. Action: Karapetyan, et al. v. Mayorkas, et al., 2:24-cv-05838-SPG (AGRx). 9 2.2. Challenging Party: A party or non-party that challenges the designation of 10 information or items under this Order. 11 2.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how it 12 is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 13 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 14 Cause Statement, including the CAR. 15 2.4. Counsel: outside counsel of record and house counsel (as well as their support 16 staff). 17 2.5. Designating Party: A party or non-party that designates information or items 18 that it files or produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 19 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 20 2.6. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the 21 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 22 other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things) that are produced or 23 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter, including the CAR. 24 2.7. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 25 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a party or its counsel to serve as 26 an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 27 2.8. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 1 2.9. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or other 2 legal entity not named as a party to this action. 3 2.10. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party to 4 this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have 5 appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that 6 has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 7 2.11. Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 8 employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel of record (and their 9 support staffs). 10 2.12. Producing Party: A party or non-party that produces disclosure or discovery 11 material in this action. 12 2.13. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support 13 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 14 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 15 and their employees and subcontractors. 16 2.14. Protected Material: Any disclosure or discovery material that is designated 17 as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 18 2.15. Receiving Party: A party that receives disclosure or discovery material from 19 a producing party. 20 3. SCOPE 21 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only protected 22 material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 23 protected material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of protected 24 material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel 25 that might reveal protected material. 26 Any use of protected material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 27 judge. This Order does not govern the use of protected material at trial. 1 4. DURATION 2 Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as CONFIDENTIAL 3 or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced as an exhibit at trial 4 becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including 5 the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed 6 otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 7 1180-81 (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in 8 discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of 9 court record). Accordingly, as to such items, the terms of this protective order do not 10 extend beyond the commencement of the trial unless confidentiality statutory and 11 regulatory requirements prohibit such disclosure to the public in which case the terms of 12 this protective order will remain in place through trial or conclusion of this case. 13 Notwithstanding the above, the CAR shall remain subject to the provisions of this 14 protective order until further order of the court indefinitely. 15 5. USE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN COURT PROCEEDINGS 16 Where a party files (or seeks to file) a document with the Court that contains 17 confidential information, the party shall comply with the procedures and requirements of 18 the Local Rules of this Court and shall properly redact any confidential information 19 contained in that document. Where redaction is not feasible because the confidential 20 information is relevant or essential to the paper(s) being filed with the Court, the party 21 must conspicuously label the document, or protected part thereof, as “CONFIDENTIAL” 22 and submit such document, or protected part thereof, to the Court with a motion requesting 23 that it be filed under seal, in accordance with the procedures set out in the local rules or 24 other applicable rules of this Court. 25 In the event confidential information is used in any court proceeding in this action, 26 it shall not lose its protected status through such use, and the party using the information 27 shall take all reasonable steps to protect its confidentiality during such use. 1 6. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 6.1. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 3 party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this 4 Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies 5 under the appropriate standards. The designating party must designate for protection 6 only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written communications 7 that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, items or 8 communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably 9 within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are 10 prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been 11 made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case 12 development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 13 parties) may expose the designating party to sanctions. If it comes to a designating 14 party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not 15 qualify for protection, that designating party must promptly notify all other parties 16 that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 17 6.2. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 18 Order (see, e.g., Section 6.2.1 below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 19 disclosure or discovery material that qualifies for protection under this Order must 20 be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced, or in the case 21 of the CAR, designated in conformity with this Order at the time of filing. 22 6.2.1. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 23 a. For information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 24 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 25 proceedings), that the producing party affix at a minimum, the legend 26 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page 27 that contains protected material. If only a portion of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the producing party also must clearly identify the 2 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 3 b. A party or non-party that makes original documents available for 4 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting 5 party has indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. 6 During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made 7 available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the 8 inspecting party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, 9 the producing party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 10 qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified 11 documents, the producing party must affix the CONFIDENTIAL legend to 12 each page that contains protected material. If only a portion of the material 13 on a page qualifies for protection, the producing party also must clearly 14 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 15 margins). 16 c. To the extent depositions are taken, the designating party shall identify 17 on the record the disclosure or discovery material that it designates as 18 protected material, or shall make such designation by letter from counsel 19 within 30 days of receipt of the official deposition transcript or copy thereof 20 (or written notification that the transcript is available), listing the specific 21 pages and lines of the transcript that should be treated as protected material. 22 The entire deposition transcript (including any exhibits not previously 23 produced in discovery in this action) shall be treated as protected material 24 under this Protective Order until the expiration of the above-referenced 30- 25 day period for designation, except that the deponent and the deponent’s 26 counsel (if any) may review the transcript of his or her own deposition at any 27 time, subject to this Protective Order and the requirement of executing the 1 CONFIDENTIAL legend shall be placed on the front of the original and each 2 copy of a deposition transcript containing “CONFIDENTIAL” information 3 or items. If the deposition was video recorded, the CONFIDENTIAL legend 4 shall be affixed to both the recording storage medium (i.e., CD or DVD) and 5 its container. The designating party shall prepare a cover letter to accompany 6 the transcript that identifies the specific pages and lines of transcript and any 7 exhibits designated as protected material. only those pages and lines and 8 exhibits designated as protected material, and their corresponding portions of 9 video, if any, shall be subject to this Protective Order. 10 d. For information produced in some form other than documentary and 11 for any other tangible items, that the producing party affix in a prominent 12 place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information 13 is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the 14 information warrants protection, the producing party, to the extent 15 practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 16 6.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure 17 to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the 18 designating party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. 19 Upon timely correction of a designation, the receiving party must make reasonable 20 efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this 21 Order. 22 7. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 23 7.1. Timing of Challenges. Any party or non-party may challenge a designation 24 of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s orders. 25 7.2. Meet and Confer. The challenging party shall initiate the dispute resolution 26 process under Local Rule 37.1, et seq. 27 7.3. Burden of Persuasion. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge 1 for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and 2 burdens on other parties) may expose the challenging party to sanctions. Unless the 3 designating party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all 4 parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to 5 which it is entitled under the producing party’s designation until the Court rules on 6 the challenge. 7 8. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 8 8.1. Basic Principles. A receiving party may use protected material that is 9 disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this 10 action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this action. Such 11 protected material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 12 conditions described in this Order. When the action has been terminated, a receiving 13 party must comply with the provisions of Section 13 below. Protected material must 14 be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner 15 that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 16 8.2. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 17 ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving 18 party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 19 a. The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action, as well 20 as employees of said outside counsel of record to whom it is reasonably 21 necessary to disclose the information for this action; 22 b. The officers, directors, and employees (including house counsel) of the 23 receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this action; 24 c. Experts (as defined in this Order) of the receiving party to whom 25 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this action and who have signed the 26 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 27 d. The court and its personnel; 1 f. Professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and professional 2 vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this action and who 3 have signed Exhibit A; 4 g. The author or recipient of a document containing the information or a 5 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 6 and 7 h. Any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 8 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 9 9. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 10 IN OTHER LITIGATION 11 If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that 12 compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as 13 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that party must: 14 a. Promptly notify in writing the designating party. Such notification 15 shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 16 b. Promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order 17 to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 18 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall 19 include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 20 c. Cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be 21 pursued by the designating party whose protected material may be affected. 22 If the designating party timely seeks a protective order, the party served with the 23 subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order 25 issued, unless the party has obtained the designating party’s permission. The designating 26 party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its 27 confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing 1 or encouraging a receiving party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another 2 court. 3 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 4 If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 5 protected material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 6 Stipulated Protective Order, the receiving party must immediately (a) notify in writing the 7 designating party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 8 unauthorized copies of the protected material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom 9 unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such 10 person or persons to execute Exhibit A. 11 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE 12 PROTECTED MATERIAL 13 When a producing party gives notice to receiving parties that certain inadvertently 14 produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of 15 the receiving parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). 16 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e- 17 discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the 19 effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client 20 privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the 21 stipulated protective order submitted to the court. 22 12. MISCELLANEOUS 23 12.1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person 24 to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 25 12.2. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective 26 Order, no party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 27 producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated 1 Protective Order. Similarly, no party waives any right to object on any ground to 2 use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 3 12.3. Filing Protected Material. A party that seeks to file under seal any protected 4 material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected material may only be 5 filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific 6 protected material at issue. If a party’s request to file protected material under seal 7 is denied by the Court, then the receiving party may file the information in the public 8 record unless otherwise instructed by the Court. 9 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 10 After the final disposition of this action, as defined in Section 4, within 60 days of 11 a written request by the designating party, each receiving party must return all protected 12 material to the producing party or destroy such material. as used in this subdivision, “all 13 protected material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other 14 format reproducing or capturing any of the protected material. Whether the protected 15 material is returned or destroyed, the receiving party must submit a written certification to 16 the producing party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the designating party) by the 17 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the protected 18 material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the receiving party has not 19 retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing 20 or capturing any of the protected material. Notwithstanding this provision, counsel are 21 entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and 22 hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert 23 reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such 24 materials contain protected material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute 25 protected material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4. 26 27 1 VIOLATION 2 Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures including, 3 || without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 4 // 5 | ITIS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 6 7 || Dated: August 29, 2025 Respectfully submitted, 8 JEELANI LAW FIRM PLC BRETT A. SHUMATE 9 Assistant Attorney General 10 /s/ Tamunotonte Fenny Tamunotonte Fenny (pro hac vice) /s/ Devin L. Barrett 11 | 3701 W Algonquin Rd Suite 630 Devin L. Barrett 2 Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 Senior Litigation Counsel (NY Bar No. 5615018) 13 |) Arthur Minas (CA Bar #290517) Office of Immigration Litigation 14 Minas Law, PC Civil Division 3620 Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 100 U.S. Department of Justice 15 Torrance, CA 90505-6018 P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station 16 Washington, DC 20044 Attorneys for Plaintiff Phone: (202) 305-8274 17 Email: devin.barrett@usdoj.gov 18 Attorneys for Defendants 19 20 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Ubi h Keeundang, 3 Dated: September 2, 2025 HONORABLE ALICIA G. ROSENBERG 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 15
1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 4 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of 5 _________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I 6 have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by 7 the United States District Court for the Central District of California on [date] in the case 8 of Karapetyan, et al. v. Mayorkas, et al., 2:24-cv-05838-SPG (AGRx). I agree to comply 9 with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand 10 and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment 11 in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any 12 information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or 13 entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 14 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for 15 the Central District of California for enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective 16 Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I 17 hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 18 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone 19 number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or 20 any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 21 22 Date: ______________________________________ 23 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 24 Printed name: _______________________________ 25 26 Signature: __________________________________ 27